IKARA · Station Log VK1HF
20 September 2026

Up, and not eating the Starlink

The DX Commander is built, guyed, fed and on the air. It took longer than it should have, the base was designed and printed the night before, and the one thing that was genuinely worried about — 100 watts from the Flex walking all over the site internet — did not happen at all.

A build day with a result. If you want the numbers, the analyser readings are all here, including the band that refuses to play.

Success. The vertical at Spring Range is no longer a pole standing in a paddock looking impressive and doing nothing — which is exactly what last visit honestly admitted it was. It is now a properly built, properly guyed, properly fed multiband antenna, and it works.

The DX Commander vertical at Ikara photographed from the base looking straight
                    up the mast against a clear blue sky, with both spreader plates and the guy
                    lines visible.
Spring Range, 20 September 2026. Looking up the mast — both spreader plates, the guys, and the support line running off to the right.

Two days, not one

Saturday was the cutting. VK1MDA came and helped measure and cut the elements and the ground radials, which is the part of a multiband vertical that is tedious rather than difficult — a lot of wire, a lot of measuring, and every mistake costs you the length permanently. Having a second pair of hands for it turned a long job into a manageable one. Thanks VK1MDA.

Sunday was the assembly, on site, from parts. It took longer than it was supposed to. That is worth writing down rather than glossing over, because it is the norm and not the exception: the job that looks like a morning turns into most of a day once you are actually standing in a paddock working out which wire goes to which tab, with no bench, no spare hardware, and the wind picking up.

The top spreader plate of the vertical against a clear sky, with the guy
                      lines and the green support line running away from it.
The top spreader plate and the guys.
The mid spreader plate on the black fibreglass mast, seen from below against
                      blue sky with gum trees behind.
The mid plate, where the element tension is set.

The red base

The base was designed and 3D printed the night before. It slides down over a small garden stake driven into the ground, and its whole job is to hold the bottom of the mast exactly where it should be while the radials and elements pull on it from every direction at once.

It is a small part and it is the difference between an antenna that stays put and one that wanders off centre the first time the wind gets into it. A vertical with a fan of elements and a spread of radials is, structurally, a thing that wants to lean — everything attached to it is pulling down and outward. Giving the base one fixed, repeatable position over a stake means the antenna goes back up in the same place and the same attitude every time it comes down.

Close-up of the antenna base plate: the black mast in an aluminium spreader
                      plate with wingnut terminals, the element wires and ground radials fanning
                      out, and the red 3D printed base beneath.
The plate, the wingnut terminals and the feedpoint — with the printed base doing its work underneath.
The base of the vertical in grass, with colour-coded element wires rising
                      from the upper plate and ground radials running out across the paddock.
Elements up, radials out. The colour tags keep track of which is which.

The thing that was actually worrying

The real question of the day had nothing to do with whether the antenna would radiate. It was whether transmitting at all would take the site off the internet.

A few weeks back a temporary antenna went up here — a random end fed half wave with no ground and no counterpoise, which is to say a half-finished antenna. It loaded, and it radiated, but a good deal of the radio frequency current went back down the outside of the coax rather than into the sky, and it caused havoc with the Starlink every time the key went down. That is common mode current doing exactly what it does: an antenna with nowhere proper to return its current will happily use the feedline, the ground and anything else conductive in the vicinity, and a satellite terminal on the same patch of ground is squarely in the vicinity.

So the question for today was simple and unpleasant: does 100 watts out of the Flex take the station's own connection down? If it did, a remote station has a genuine problem, because everything here — the SDRs, the telemetry, the radio itself — is reached over that link.

No such issues. Nothing dropped, nothing stuttered, no reboots. A properly grounded vertical with a real radial field gives the current somewhere to go, and it turns out that is not merely theory. That single result is worth more than the antenna itself, because it is what makes transmitting from here compatible with operating from here.

Where it is resonant

The analyser came out and the numbers are good — and good in the right direction.

FrequencySWRRXNote
6.9551 MHz1.0460~45 kHz below 40m
10.209 MHz1.1464just above 30m
13.897 MHz1.0450~100 kHz below 20m
28.126 MHz1.24319in the 10m band

Resistances in the mid forties with reactance at or near zero is about as clean as a ground mounted vertical gets. More to the point, the dips are mostly sitting below where they want to be, and that is the right mistake to make. An element that is too long is a pair of side cutters and five minutes; an element that is too short means splicing wire back on, or cutting a new one. Low is a trim. High is a rebuild.

MFJ-259C analyser display reading 6.9551 MHz, SWR 1.0, R=46, X=0.
6.9551 MHz — SWR 1.0, R 46, X 0.
MFJ-259C analyser display reading 10.209 MHz, SWR 1.1, R=46, X=4.
10.209 MHz — SWR 1.1, R 46, X 4.
MFJ-259C analyser display reading 13.897 MHz, SWR 1.0, R=45, X=0.
13.897 MHz — SWR 1.0, R 45, X 0.
MFJ-259C analyser display reading 28.126 MHz, SWR 1.2, R=43, X=19.
28.126 MHz — SWR 1.2, R 43, X 19.

Except twenty metres

Twenty will not tune. Not marginally, not with the tuner working hard — not at all. Something has clearly been done wrong on that element, and no amount of optimism about the other bands changes it.

There is a clue sitting in the table above, though. The 13.897 MHz dip is almost exactly twice 6.9551 MHz. A quarter wave element on forty metres is a half wave at twice the frequency, and a half wave fed against ground presents a high impedance, not a low one — so a clean-looking dip just under fourteen megahertz may not be the twenty metre element answering at all. It may be the forty metre element's second harmonic, with the actual twenty metre element not connected, not making contact at the plate, or not doing anything useful at all.

That is a theory rather than a diagnosis. But it is a testable one, and it is the first thing to check next visit: disconnect forty at the plate and sweep again. If the dip at 13.9 disappears, the answer is at the terminal, not in the wire.

The base of the vertical with the site's two solar panels on their timber
                      mounts in the background.
The vertical, with the solar array behind it.
The antenna base in the foreground with the Spring Range paddock and gum
                      trees behind it under a clear winter sky.
Spring Range, looking out past the feedpoint.

On the air

A quick CW test to finish. Listening back through the Iron Range SDR — well to the south east, and a fair test of whether anything is actually leaving the paddock — the signal was a solid S9.

That is the whole point of the exercise. The station can now transmit, it gets out, and it does not knock itself off the internet while doing it. Everything after this is refinement.

What changed

Next visit

All photographs from the day — gallery →
IKARA · VK1HF · Spring Range